Our 2023 Tucson hybrid is getting a stellar 24.5 mpg average after 10k miles, according to Hyundai it is acceptable and not their problem! I won’t support Hyundai in the future!
Hey, that's better than my 22.5 or less mileage. Winter blend fuel? City driving only? I just know in summer I got a high of 31.5 because of two trips a week across town to play golf. I kinda' thought it would be more, small 4 cylinder engine and all.Our 2023 Tucson hybrid is getting a stellar 24.5 mpg average after 10k miles, according to Hyundai it is acceptable and not their problem! I won’t support Hyundai in the future!
I certainly don't! I thought I would, being an older driver and all, but nope.It seems your problem cause most people get over 32mpg 🤷
This is a post about the hybrid powertrain, best to be clear you have the 2.5 ICE powertrain.I certainly don't! I thought I would, being an older driver and all, but nope.
REVELATIONMy mileage sucks too, I've got a 22 Hybrid limited. That said it was much better before it got cold...
View attachment 2694
I'd like to address this statement. Much of what you said was spot on except the statement I quoted above. Though this is true in concept, there's another (and much greater) force at play here. Fuel doesn't vaporize nearly as quickly or as thoroughly at colder temps as it should. This far outweighs any benefits of a cooler denser charge. It has a HUGE effect on gas mileage and unfortunately on hybrid vehicles. According to the department of energy's website, your not just reading some random opinion here. You can read their brief report on this subject here: CLICKYfor in winter you get better MPG with a ICE for the air has more O2 and dense
No dual injection but a unique valve train that contributes to increased economy and lower emissions. It is the only engine like it in the world. Hyundai’s Breakthrough Engine that Answers a 133-year Challenge - Hyundai Motor Group TECHId be willing to bet the fact the 2.5 ICE has port and direct injection, it has some play into why some of us can find that sweet spot depending on how we drive and road conditions/hills.
Does the little 1.6 turbo have dual injection as well?
I get that you are disappointed and I understand it, but you all repeatedly misrepresent the mileage numbers. You can't expect to be taken seriously.So, we are whiners for stating our results! I purchased my 2023 tucson hybrid blue because of the ADVERTISED 38/38 MPG. I didn't see anything about must drive 50mph on a Highway, going down hill with a tailwind, no spare tire, driving barefoot, with only 1/2 tank if gas after you've driven 12,001 miles. I exaggerate but I'm not far off, you get the idea. if the MPG was tested and in the real world then we, the whiners, wouldn't have anything to whine about. I have 2,400 mile on mine and get only 27.8mpg on a 55° day going 65pmh. Yes, i know I should be driving at 50mph....that wouldn't be a Highway!!!
I've had two hyundai Elantras and and I always could reached the advertised mpg after the first 500-700 miles, summer, fall, winter, or spring. I drove 65-70mph, i carried a spare tire, a passenger, and a full tank of gas....
Maybe Hyundai need to list summer and winter MPG.
I can't see how my MPG is going to jump from 28/27 to something close to 38/38 by the temperature raising to 60, 70° or does it need to got to 92.5°?
Well, enough whining for now, but anytime anyone asks how I like my new car, I'm sure they check the 2023 tucso Hybrid off their list if they're looking for a fuel efficient car.
I think everyone want to make decisions on accurate info from the manufacturer.
I would like to see how this engine would perform in a non-hybrid car.Mungo, that was some impressive reading. Thanks for supplying the link. I learned a few things, though my head's still spinning from all the details in that article. Hyundai is developing some real world-class engines. Sad that all this is taking place on the precipice of a new chapter in automotive engineering. Seems most manufacturers are diverting their best engineers and resources away from developing ICE engines, and moving toward the inevitable future of electric propulsion. That's what makes Hyundai's new technology so amazing. It takes a lot of resources to bring this kind of ICE technology to market.
How the heck did you get 10,000 miles on it already without doing lots of high speed interstate travel or a crap ton of short trips in winter?
My 2017 Tucson Eco had the 1.6L turbo. It was GDI only. I really liked the engine. It was easy to do routine maintenance; one set of plugs, one accessory drive belt, air filters, oil changes. (That was it in 116k miles.) However, I did not like the 7-speed DCT that Hyundai used. I think Hyundai used a dry DCT to get just a tiny bit more efficiency out of the power train. The car was awesome on the highway, gear changes were nearly instant. However, stop-go traffic, slowly pulling out of an intersection; were not good at all (bordering on dangerous). The DCT struggled to find that sweet spot of soft acceleration. Computers aren't nearly as good at feathering the clutch as us humans. My wife's CX-5 uses a wet DCT and while it costs a few points in efficiency, it's much better in stop-go traffic and city driving.Id be willing to bet the fact the 2.5 ICE has port and direct injection, it has some play into why some of us can find that sweet spot depending on how we drive and road conditions/hills.
Does the little 1.6 turbo have dual injection as well?